Mission to Mars
Here’s a short list of adjectives one might use to describe Brian De Palma’s new sci fi
thriller, Mission to Mars:
Predictable, corny, contrived, ridiculous, laughable, unbelievable, unrealistic, stupid,
over-the-top, melodramatic, bad, horrible, dumb, over-done, clichéd, hackneyed, unimaginative,
trite, pretentious, childish, banal, repetitive, boring, hideous, and disgusting.
Okay, maybe I’m being a bit unfair. After all, I should have been prepared for this. It’s
not like De Palma is known for making consistently good, satisfying films. In fact, if I had to
pick a scene from one of his movies that was emblematic of his style, I’d choose the infamous
chainsaw scene from Scarface. Admittedly, sometimes a chainsaw to the face is an effective
way of getting a point across. But most of the time it really, really isn’t, and De Palma has never
been able to understand that. For him everything has to be chainsaws filmed in split screen from
two different angles in slow motion, while blaring music and agonized screaming vie for
prominence on the soundtrack. As a result of this his career has been wildly erratic. After the
powerful, intense thriller Carrie, he put Michael Caine in drag and told him to murder hookers in
Dressed to Kill. He hit the peak of his talent and effectiveness with The Untouchables, the
exciting story of how Eliot Ness and his crack team of cops took down Al Capone. Then he
made the unforgivably mediocre Snake Eyes. And now, after the rather enjoyable Mission:
Impossible, he gives us this piece of eye and ear pollution.
Mission to Mars as a whole is an ugly, mutated clone of Apollo 13, 2001 and various
episodes of "Star Trek." It’s the story of--you guessed it--the first manned mission to Mars. The
team is headed by Luc Goddard (Don Cheadle of Boogie Nights and Out of Sight), and also
includes a couple of Russians (they’re foreigners, so you know they’re gonna die). Luc shares a
very loving but completely platonic relationship with Jim McConnell (Gary Sinise) and Woody
Blake (Tim Robbins). Woody is heading up a second, follow-up mission to Mars, which will
include comic sidekick Phil Ohlmyer (Jerry O’Connell, the boyish-looking fellow from Scream 2
and the TV series "Sliders"), and Woody’s wife, Terri (Connie Nielsen of Rushmore). (A
married couple going to space together sound like a bad idea to you? Not to the screenwriters!)
Anyway, the first group to go to Mars comes upon an inexplicable phenomenon that
attacks them, kills a large portion of them (rather spectacularly, I might add), and cuts them off
from contact with the people back home (note that at this point this could still be the plot
summary of just about any sci fi movie). So the second group hurries to Mars, now determined
to rescue their comrades and discover what force attacked them. (Could it be...aliens?! Duh, of
course it is, didn’t you see the trailer?) On the way, there is a contrived interlude in which an
emergency completely unrelated to the main plot is introduced in a shameless attempt both to
imitate Apollo 13 and to pad out the film with more melodrama and special effects shots. Later
on, the movie will claim that a normal human can look at a couple of strands of DNA and tell
you exactly what species they would make up. Then the movie will try to impress you with an
amazing story about the origin of life that you’ve heard ten times before. Then it will mash
together some uplifting thoughts about life in the universe into a corny mush and serve it to you
on a platter.
But before any of that happens, right off the bat, the movie screws up. It opens up at a
party on Earth celebrating the pending mission to Mars. This party is extremely similar to the
party at the beginning of Apollo 13, except it’s boring, and it’s heavily laden with exposition,
back story, and decidedly forced kidding-around-like-old-friends talk. Also, if Mission to Mars
has one strength, it is its special effects. Many of the visuals in this film are absolutely stunning
(even though many of them were clearly derived from the stunning visuals of previous sci-fi
films like 2001 and The Abyss). So why start the movie on Earth, during a party? Through the
whole opening sequence I was sitting there thinking, "Who are these annoying, fake people
spouting off clumsy clichés at one another? Get to the damn aliens and spaceships!"
Some scenes in Mission to Mars go on about five minutes longer than they should.
Others should never have been filmed at all. Also, if this was the first movie I’d seen Robbins
and Sinise in, I would have said, "Wow, those two old white guys are terrible actors." That’s
because their dialogue is laughably awful and their direction, as I have already suggested, utterly
ridiculous. Robbins and Sinise, along with the other actors, mug and grieve and groan and
scream, "Oh, my God!" until I just had to cover my eyes in disbelief and disgust and try not to
It took three screenwriters to build this towering mountain of garbage; all three of them
together couldn’t come up with one original idea. Two of them are Jim and John Thomas, a pair
of screenwriting brothers also responsible for Predator, Predator 2 and Wild Wild West. The
third is Graham Yost, who crafted such gems as Speed and Broken Arrow. I detect a distinct
downhill trend in the quality of their work. In fact, given this current tendency, I predict their
next attempt will produce a screenplay of such monstrous, blood-sucking, zombie-like
characteristics that they should be banned from writing now, before it’s too late.
Not that these guys really "wrote" the screenplay for Mission to Mars. They just
compiled it from the scripts of countless other action and sci fi films. Then they dumbed it
down, replaced all the good dialogue with clichés, and tacked a "fade out" on the end.
Hollywood has been criticized for its tendency to remake perfectly good films as far
worse films simply in order to make a profit. But these days Hollywood is also engaging in an
even more despicable and insidious process--the witless pastiche. Grab hunks of other, better
movies, jam them together, turn all the dialogue into simple catch-phrases, repackage it, and
you’ve got a blockbuster, right?
Please, please, answer this question with a resounding "No." Please, don’t go see
Mission to Mars. You’re smarter than this movie. You deserve better.
|© Copyright 2003-2017 Jim Genzano, All Rights Reserved|
Like what you see here? Show your gratitude in the form of cold, hard cash, and you could help me make it even better!